A taxpayer does not qualify for the first-time homebuyer credit of up to $8,000 if the home is purchased from an ancestor or other related party, including a parent. In one case, a taxpayer who bought his home from his parents claimed the credit because he did not know about this specific eligibility rule. In all other respects, he qualified; he was a first-time homebuyer with income below the credit threshold.
He argued that he was entitled to the credit because the IRS did not make this specific rule clear:
The Tax Court rejected the taxpayer’s argument. The ban on purchases from related parties is a statutory rule that the Court cannot change or ignore. The fact that the taxpayer’s accountant failed to learn the details of the credit was unfortunate for the taxpayer. Neither the IRS’s omission of this information nor the accountant’s failure to learn it provides any legal basis for allowing the credit.
Source: Cary Allen Nievinski v. Commissioner; T.C. Summ. Op. 2011-10
A written determination issued to a taxpayer by the IRS that interprets and applies the tax laws to the taxpayer’s specific set of facts. A letter ruling advises the taxpayer regarding the tax treatment that can be expected from the IRS in the circumstances specified by the ruling. It may not be used or cited as precedent by another taxpayer.